On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 5:34 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20110131:
>>
>> Dropped tree: xen
>>
>> The tty.current tree lost its conflict.
>>
>> The slab tree still has its build failure so I used the version from
>> next-20110121.
>>
>> The suspend tree lost its build failure.
>>
>> The sparc64 defconfig build has been fixed.
>>
>> The powerpc allyesconfig build has been broken by some obscure bloating
>> of the low memory code.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [ CC greg-kh ]
>
> Build error:
> ...
> drivers/staging/usbvideo/vicam.c:222:57: error: expected â;â before â)â token
> drivers/staging/usbvideo/vicam.c:222:57: error: expected statement
> before â)â token
> ...
>
> This should be fixed by:
>
> Index: linux-next-20110201/drivers/staging/usbvideo/vicam.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-next-20110201.orig/drivers/staging/usbvideo/vicam.c
> +++ linux-next-20110201/drivers/staging/usbvideo/vicam.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ set_camera_power(struct vicam_camera *ca
> Â{
> Â Â Â Âint status;
>
> - Â Â Â status = send_control_msg(cam, 0x50, state, 0, NULL, 0));
> + Â Â Â status = send_control_msg(cam, 0x50, state, 0, NULL, 0);
> Â Â Â Âif (status < 0)
> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Âreturn status;
>
> - Sedat -
>
[ Changed... TO Timo von Holtz + CC sfr ]
Just FYI:
The problem was introduced in staging-next GIT branch:
commit 046d747e0d2cb597e0b6fa4a79c32b43e97ed792
"taging: usbvideo: vicam: fixed some coding style issues"
- Sedat -
[1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging-2.6.git;a=commit;h=046d747e0d2cb597e0b6fa4a79c32b43e97ed792
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
