On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:59:54PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 01/19/11 16:38, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:12:19AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 01/19/11 08:10, Randy Dunlap wrote: > >>> On 01/18/11 21:09, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >>>> Hi Randy, > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 09:17:49 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm seeing this on several builds (i386 and x86_64): > >>>>> > >>>>> lib/built-in.o:(__modver+0x8): undefined reference to `__modver_version_show' > >>>>> lib/built-in.o:(__modver+0x2c): undefined reference to `__modver_version_show' > >>>>> > >>>>> It looks like the compiler or linker is dropping that function from the > >>>>> build since it cannot see any references to it... > >>>>> At least __modver_version_show is not in the kernel/params.o file. > >>>> > >>>> Do these builds have CONFIG_SYSFS set? > >>>> > >>> > >>> Yes, they all do (50 random builds have CONFIG_SYSFS=y). > >> > >> Gawd, what bad grepping this morning. > >> > >> You hit the nail. They do not have SYSFS enabled. > >> > > > > Argh, this one is my fault, the following should fix it. > > > > Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > Great! Hopefully Rusty will be able to fold it in the original change so it won't break bisects. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
