Re: Reorganization of git.secretlab.ca branches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Grant,

On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 10:35:26 -0700 Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I've reorganized my git tree to be clearer, so I'd like to update the
> list of branches that you're pulling from me for linux-next:
> 
> Here are the branches you're currently pulling:
> 
> gcl-current	git	git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#merge
> 52xx-and-virtex	git	git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#next
> devicetree	git	git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#next-devicetree
> spi		git	git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#next-spi
> 
> I've been using 2 branches for each subsystem that I'm maintaining;
> one for bug fixes that should be merged relatively quickly, and one
> for linux-next.  Most of the time the 'merge' branches are empty, but
> once in a while I've got a bugfix that I want to give wider testing
> before asking Linus to pull.  So, I'm thinking that I'd like to change
> the trees that you merge to:
> 
> 52xx-and-virtex-current	git	git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#powerpc/merge
> 52xx-and-virtex	git	git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#powerpc/next
> 
> devicetree-current	git	git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#devicetree/merge
> devicetree	git	git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#devicetree/next
> 
> spi-current		git	git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#spi/merge
> spi		git	git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6#spi/next
> 
> Does this sound reasonable to you?

Looks good and all done.  I think you may have not put your powerpx fix
into your powerpc/merge branch yet, though.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgpTxcHgnt7ZQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux