On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 11:44 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > On Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:58:26 -0500 (EST) Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Kconfig select needs to be fixed so that it is not possible to > > select something if that something's dependencies are not met. > > So, should the config step fail if such a thing is attempted, or just not > honour the "select"? > > BTW, Linus asked me to investigate the alternative of having "select" > (recursively) automatically set the dependencies if they are not already > set ... > What happens if you have foo depends on bar || fib ? Do you automatically enable bar and fib? -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
