Hi Ryusuke, Today's linux-next merge of the nilfs2 tree got a conflict in fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h between commit b74c79e99389cd79b31fcc08f82c24e492e63c7e ("fs: provide rcu-walk aware permission i_ops") from Linus' tree and commit aa9ded135baf342ec5a299b254f0e0dbd5c3c0f0 ("nilfs2: do not pass sbi to functions which can get it from inode") from the nilfs2 tree. Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx diff --cc fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h index 0ca9882,04ba110..0000000 --- a/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h +++ b/fs/nilfs2/nilfs.h @@@ -256,14 -251,14 +251,14 @@@ extern void nilfs_update_inode(struct i extern void nilfs_truncate(struct inode *); extern void nilfs_evict_inode(struct inode *); extern int nilfs_setattr(struct dentry *, struct iattr *); -int nilfs_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask); +int nilfs_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask, unsigned int flags); - extern int nilfs_load_inode_block(struct nilfs_sb_info *, struct inode *, - struct buffer_head **); + int nilfs_load_inode_block(struct inode *inode, struct buffer_head **pbh); extern int nilfs_inode_dirty(struct inode *); - extern int nilfs_set_file_dirty(struct nilfs_sb_info *, struct inode *, - unsigned); + int nilfs_set_file_dirty(struct inode *inode, unsigned nr_dirty); extern int nilfs_mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *); extern void nilfs_dirty_inode(struct inode *); + int nilfs_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo, + __u64 start, __u64 len); /* super.c */ extern struct inode *nilfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html