Hi All, On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 11:52:08 +0100 Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > JFYI: > I pulled in patches from linux-2.6-block#for-next (up to commit > 6573422f81efa3bd71848dc584c35d4318d3de0b): > "Merge branch 'for-2.6.38/core' into for-next" > ...into linux-next (next-20110107) and now I get: > > $ grep block build_linux-next_next20110107.dileks.2.log > 30886 blocks > CC fs/block_dev.o > CC mm/memblock.o > CC kernel/power/block_io.o > /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37/debian/build/source_i386_none/kernel/trace/blktrace.c:999:2: > warning: passing argument 1 of âregister_trace_block_bio_completeâ > from incompatible pointer type > /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37/debian/build/source_i386_none/include/trace/events/block.h:240:1: > note: expected âvoid (*)(void *, struct request_queue *, struct bio *, > int)â but argument is of type âvoid (*)(void *, struct request_queue > *, struct bio *)â > /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37/debian/build/source_i386_none/kernel/trace/blktrace.c:1038:2: > warning: passing argument 1 of âunregister_trace_block_bio_completeâ > from incompatible pointer type > /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.37/debian/build/source_i386_none/include/trace/events/block.h:240:1: > note: expected âvoid (*)(void *, struct request_queue *, struct bio *, > int)â but argument is of type âvoid (*)(void *, struct request_queue > *, struct bio *)â I reported that separately today and Mathieu Desnoyers (cc'd) has said that he will supply a patch. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpgd0CTsnI7O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
