Hi Tejun,
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 06:13:14 +0100 Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > After merging the percpu tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c: In function 'intel_thermal_interrupt':
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c:368: error: implicit declaration of function 'this_cpu_has'
> >
> > Caused by commit 6ac0bb7148b93fb40bccba5dff06d51a3e3ea283 ("x86: use
> > this_cpu_has for thermal_interrupt").
> >
> > this_cpu_has() does not exist anywhere except in this introduced usage.
> >
> > I have used the percpu tree from next-20101231 for today.
>
> My apologies. I forgot an earlier patch to introduce this_cpu_has()
> macro. I've reverted the offending commit.
But that revert is not in your published for-next branch yet. I have
manually reverted that commit for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpoRfQ9yuWwZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
