On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:39:14 -0600 James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 08:29 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:30:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > [The mirroring on kernel.org is running slowly] > > > > > > Changes since 20101227: > > > > > > warning: (TARGET_CORE && GFS2_FS) selects CONFIGFS_FS which has unmet direct dependencies (SYSFS) > > > > from: > > > > menuconfig TARGET_CORE > > tristate "Generic Target Core Mod (TCM) and ConfigFS Infrastructure" > > select CONFIGFS_FS > > > > but CONFIGFS_FS depends on SYSFS, so TARGET_CORE should either depend on SYSFS > > or (eek) it should select SYSFS. > > The latter, I think (and actually, configfs should select sysfs). All > these unmet dependencies are a minefield. It's just another language to deal with. Not a big deal, except for the twists that EXPERIMENTAL injects into it. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** desserts: http://www.xenotime.net/linux/recipes/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
