Re: linux-next: Tree for December 10 (x86 nmi_watchdog)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:57:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>
> NO. I don't think this is the correct one. Cause we don't want
> touch_softlockup_watchdog() to be called if
> CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR=y.
>
I think simply removing touch_softlockup_watchdog() definition from
hw_nmi.c is right. Am I right, Don?

thanks,
rakib
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux