On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:57:46 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> > > NO. I don't think this is the correct one. Cause we don't want > touch_softlockup_watchdog() to be called if > CONFIG_HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR=y. > I think simply removing touch_softlockup_watchdog() definition from hw_nmi.c is right. Am I right, Don? thanks, rakib -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
