On 2010-11-22 21:15, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 11/15/2010 01:07 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2010-11-15 22:04, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> On 11/14/2010 04:23 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Today's linux-next merge of the xen tree got a conflict in
>>>> drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c between commit
>>>> 02e031cbc843b010e72fcc05c76113c688b2860f ("block: remove
>>>> REQ_HARDBARRIER") from Linus' tree and commits
>>>> c64e38ea17a81721da0393584fd807f8434050fa ("xen/blkfront: map REQ_FLUSH
>>>> into a full barrier") and be2f8373c188ed1f5d36003c9928e4d695213080
>>>> ("xen/blkfront: Implement FUA with BLKIF_OP_WRITE_BARRIER") from the xen
>>>> tree.
>>>>
>>>> I used the xen tree version.
>>> I'll drop that because you should be seeing those changes come via Jens.
>> Yep, since Linus pulled the last batch, for-linus now has the next bits
>> (which include the xen barrier set).
>
> These don't seem to be in -rc3. Did they get dropped on the ground
> somewhere?
No, they are in for-linus as written above. Just not shipped off yet,
will be soon.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
