Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the fsnotify tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 12:53 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> After merging the fsnotify tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> fs/notify/mark.c: In function 'fsnotify_add_mark':
> fs/notify/mark.c:230: error: 'struct fsnotify_group' has no member named 'fanotify_data'
> 
> Caused by commit 0ed64ab6b338e4269c9f25de83781619ecd624f1 ("fsnotify:
> code and error path cleanup in fsnotify_add_mark").  This build has
> CONFIG_FANOTIFY not set.
> 
> I have used the fsnotify tree from next-20101109 for today.

I wasn't actually that commit it was:

5876b30fc2c91d67386f91da62b14f159d7bb41f ("fanotify: Do check against
max_marks and increase number of group marks atomically")

Lino, I knew there was a reason I was happy with the small race.  Would
you like to take another stab or should I just revert?

-Eric




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux