On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 12:53 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Eric, > > After merging the fsnotify tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this: > > fs/notify/mark.c: In function 'fsnotify_add_mark': > fs/notify/mark.c:230: error: 'struct fsnotify_group' has no member named 'fanotify_data' > > Caused by commit 0ed64ab6b338e4269c9f25de83781619ecd624f1 ("fsnotify: > code and error path cleanup in fsnotify_add_mark"). This build has > CONFIG_FANOTIFY not set. > > I have used the fsnotify tree from next-20101109 for today. I wasn't actually that commit it was: 5876b30fc2c91d67386f91da62b14f159d7bb41f ("fanotify: Do check against max_marks and increase number of group marks atomically") Lino, I knew there was a reason I was happy with the small race. Would you like to take another stab or should I just revert? -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html