Am Donnerstag 21 Oktober 2010, 21:45:35 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag 21 Oktober 2010, 18:09:22 schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
> > > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > > Thomas,
> > > >
> > > > Your commit c5f7563 ("genirq: Provide compat handling for
> > > > chip->enable()") breaks UML.
> > > > It does not start anymore.
> > > >
> > > > When I apply this patch it works fine again.
> > > > http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/um-migrate-from-__do
> > > > _irq -to- generic_handle_irq.patch
> > > >
> > > > Maybe your patch breaks all users of __do_IRQ()?
> > >
> > > Not intentionally :)
> > >
> > > The irq_chip of um has it's own dummy enable function, so the compat
> > > code uses it.
> > >
> > > +static void compat_irq_enable(struct irq_data *data)
> > > +{
> > > + data->chip->enable(data->irq);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > + if (chip->enable)
> > > + chip->irq_enable = compat_irq_enable;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * The real defaults
> > > + */
> > > + if (!chip->irq_enable)
> > > + chip->irq_enable = default_enable;
> > >
> > > So I really can't see how's that supposed to break UM
> >
> > This patch solves the issue for me.
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > //richard
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/irq/resend.c b/kernel/irq/resend.c
> > index 891115a..1fb4012 100644
> > --- a/kernel/irq/resend.c
> > +++ b/kernel/irq/resend.c
> > @@ -60,8 +60,11 @@ void check_irq_resend(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned
> > int irq)
> >
> > /*
> >
> > * Make sure the interrupt is enabled, before resending it:
> > */
> >
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED
> > + desc->irq_data.chip->enable(irq);
> > +#elif
> >
> > desc->irq_data.chip->irq_enable(&desc->irq_data);
> >
> > -
> > +#endif
> >
> > /*
> >
> > * We do not resend level type interrupts. Level type
> > * interrupts are resent by hardware when they are still
>
> Why shold it solve it ? irq_enable is set to compat_irq_enable which
> in turn calls chip->enable.
>
> So how's that different ?
I took a closer look on the issue.
check_irq_resend() gets called before irq_chip_set_defaults().
In the first call to check_irq_resend() desc->irq_data.chip->irq_enable is
NULL. UML dies due to a NULL-pointer dereference...
I don't know why check_irq_resend() is called before irq_chip_set_defaults().
It's your code. ;-)
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
