* Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:37:26PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Grant,
> >
> > After merging the devicetree tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/irq.c:280: warning: 'struct device_node' declared inside parameter list
> >
> > Introduced by commit 27f4e2b1060be8bc38146fd30986e7c2858e2a5f ("x86/of:
> > define irq functions to allow drivers/of/* to build on x86"). This build
> > has CONFIG_OF not set.
>
> Thanks Stephen. Does the following patch fix things?
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> index 4417f49..23216f7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -276,12 +276,14 @@ void smp_x86_platform_ipi(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vector_used_by_percpu_irq);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> unsigned int irq_create_of_mapping(struct device_node *controller,
> const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize)
> {
> return intspec[0];
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_create_of_mapping);
> +#endif
Sigh, 'of' is the most misnamed Linux subsystem in history! 'CONFIG_OF_' always
makes me ask 'config of what?' irq_create_of_mapping ditto.
Why not OFW or OPENFIRMWARE?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
