Yes all ok. J "Stefano Stabellini" <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Hi Stefano, >> >> [just casting the net a bit wider ...] >> >> On Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:51:47 +0100 Stefano Stabellini ><stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >> > I forgot to CC the LKML and linux-next... >> > >> > On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> > > Stephen, >> > > I have two patch series to merge in linux-next: >> > > >> > > PV on HVM: receive interrupts as xen events >> > > xen: initial domain support >> > > >> > > they have all the acked-by needed and are both stable since >several >> > > weeks, however they depend on Konrad's xen-pcifront series and >for this >> > > reason I waited until now to ask for a merge in linux-next. >> > > >> > > Could you please pull: >> > > >> > > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git >linux-next-initial-domain-v4 >> > > >> > > it contains both series rebased on Konrad's pcifront series >merged on >> > > linux-next (warning: it still contains the merge commit of >> > > xen-pcifront-0.8.2 in linux-next). >> > > Let me know if you have any conflicts or if you need me to change >the >> > > branch somehow. >> >> Not following the Xen develpment at all, I would like to have a >positive >> reply from the listed Xen contacts, please, >> > >Sure. >Jeremy? > > >> I do have concerns that this is turning up so late, but I realise >that >> that is mainly due to a misunderstanding on the part of some of the >Xen >> community. >> > >Thank you very much for understanding! > > >> Also, the above tree is based on next-20101019 which means that I >cannot >> use it as is. All the trees merged into linux-next must be base on >some >> other stable tree (almost always Linus' tree). linux-next is rebuilt >> from scratch every day, so I cannot ever include a previous day's >version. >> >> Merging in other stable trees is OK (as long as the other maintainer >is >> aware of that and makes sure that their tree does not reabse). >> >> Basically what you send to me should be what you intend to send to >Linus >> during the next merge window. > >All right. >I merged Jeremy's and Konrad's branches (the ones you just merged on >linux-next) on top of linux 2.6.36 rc8, then I rebased my series on top >of the result. >Please checkout this branch: > >git://xenbits.xen.org/people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git >2.6.36-rc8-initial-domain-v5 > >and let me know if it is suitable, it shouldn't have any merge >conflicts. > >Cheers, > >Stefano > >_______________________________________________ >Virtualization mailing list >Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
