On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:08:18 -0700 Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:03:34PM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote: > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:51:54 -0700 > > Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 07:24:54PM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:45:31 -0700 > > > > Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:37:56 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > Changes since 20100930: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon_xo_1.c:57: error: implicit > > > > > declaration of function 'geode_gpio_event_irq' > > > > > drivers/staging/olpc_dcon/olpc_dcon_xo_1.c:57: error: implicit > > > > > declaration of function 'geode_gpio' > > > > > > > > Yep, it's pending a cs5535-gpio patch > > > > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/209482/). > > > > > > Wait, as I didn't apply the later patches, what I did apply should > > > have still built properly (remember our rule, no breakage at any > > > point in a patch series.) So, should I revert the last olpc patch > > > that caused this problem? > > > > > > > Sorry, I thought that was made clear by the "this patch is necessary > > for building the driver" comments in each patch description. The > > original driver that was submitted doesn't build unless all patches > > are applied (the only which touches external APIs is the pending > > cs5535-gpio one). > > Ok, I'll go mark the driver as depending on CONFIG_BROKEN for now, > until we get that resolved, as we can't have a driver that breaks the > build in the tree. > > thanks, > > greg k-h Sounds good. After the two outstanding patches are applied, CONFIG_BROKEN can be safely removed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
