Hi Ingo, On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 09:01:23 +0200 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Fortunately there's a really simple solution: wait for an explicit reply > from a maintainer before adding a new-feature tree. (Solicite again via > a To: email if the Cc: went unanswered by the maintainers.) Sure we can try that. > Could you please start using that method for all subsystems i > co-maintain? So, to be clear, from the MAINTAINERS file that would be LOCKDEP AND LOCKSTAT, PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEM, SCHEDULER, TRACING, and X86 ARCHITECTURE. Any others? If so could you please update the MAINTAINERS file as (at my age) I am likely to forget and other may not guess. Thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpAZEpVx7O07.pgp
Description: PGP signature
