Re: linux-next: manual merge of the lost-spurious-irq tree with the tip tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/05/2010 08:55 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I think Stephen had done enough.  At the time, I wasn't sure which
> tree it was going to go through and it took some time before Thomas
> responded, so I was intending to push it through separately.  I should
> have retracted the tree right after it was determined to be
> reimplemented but forgot.  That's my mistake not Stephen's.  Sorry
> about that.

Oooh, apparently I knew it was gonna go through genirq but expected it
to go through as-is and wanted to accelerate testing.  FWIW, I'm
sure everyone involved was notified of the move at the time.  At any
rate, won't happen again.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux