On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:23:02AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > The former removed that code that the latter changed. I just used the > former. > The latter was just changing some names, so ti may be able to be > integrated into the former. Though doing that would break bisection. The other option would be to revert the bit of the multi-component change that does the rename which I think should be safe - Sacha, Liam, does that seem sensible? There is the issue with other potential non-audio users of the SSI to be considered. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
