Re: kexec load failure introduced by "x86, memblock: Replace e820_/_early string with memblock_"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- "Yinghai Lu" <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 09/25/2010 11:55 PM, CAI Qian wrote:
> >>
> >> are you kexec from 2.6.35+ to 2.6.36-rc3+?
> > No, both kernels were the same version. I am sorry the above logs
> were misleading that were copy-and-pasted from different kernel
> versions.
> 
> can you check tip instead of next tree?
I am wondering which patches there do you think would make the regression go away?
> 
> Yinghai
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kexec mailing list
> kexec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux