On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 08:39:22AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:29:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (arm > > > assabet_defconfig and serveral other arm configs) failed like this: > > > > > > arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'arm_memory_present': > > > arch/arm/mm/init.c:260: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code > > > arch/arm/mm/init.c:338: error: invalid storage class for function 'free_area' > > > arch/arm/mm/init.c:357: error: invalid storage class for function 'free_memmap' > > > arch/arm/mm/init.c:386: error: invalid storage class for function 'free_unused_memmap' > > > arch/arm/mm/init.c:601: error: invalid storage class for function 'keepinitrd_setup' > > > arch/arm/mm/init.c:606: error: initializer element is not constant > > > arch/arm/mm/init.c:606: error: (near initialization for '__setup_keepinitrd_setup.setup_func') > > > arch/arm/mm/init.c:606: error: expected declaration or statement at end of input > > > arch/arm/mm/init.c:252: warning: unused variable 'i' > > > > > > Caused by commit 719c1514f2fef5f01fcfa2bba81b7bb079c7c6a1 ("memblock/arm: > > > Use new accessors") which forgot a closing brace on a new > > > for_each_memblock() in arm_memory_present(). > > > > So this commit is back in tip and the error is back in the builds ... > > The ARM defconfig build doesnt fail here: > > WARNING: modpost: Found 5 section mismatch(es). > To see full details build your kernel with: > 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y' It probably passes because that configuration doesn't result in the failing code being built (maybe the failing code is only used for sparsemem ?) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html