On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 18:50:02 +0200 Robert Richter wrote: > On 01.09.10 12:41:32, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Using do/while for a function-returning-a-value does not > > make gcc happy, so change it to a static inline function. > > (happens when CONFIG_PM is not enabled) > > > > arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c:784: error: expected expression before 'do' > > > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I already sent a fix to Ingo that fixes this. > > Will update my for-next branch as soon as it is applied in tip. Good. But I looked at oprofile.git and didn't see any such patch. Did I miss it there? Can you point me to it, please? --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
