On 2010-08-24 09:13, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:53:28 +1000
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/s390/char/tape_block.c between commit
>> 7dc74a8fdb22f4410a2d8e45353c9ea75821a9ba ("[S390] tape: fix kernel panic
>> when setting tape device offline") from the s390 tree and commit
>> 52cc2eef31587b22ce9fbe77b064a031a9613ab0 ("block: switch s390 tape_block
>> and mg_disk to elevator_change()") from the block tree.
>>
>> I assume that the latter removes the need for the former, so I used that.
>
> The patch in the block tree includes the fix for the s390 tape driver.
> So I guess its best if I remove the s390 specific patch from the
> git390 tree.
>
Probably best, since the change in my tree is different from the
one you likely merged. So it will clash, as Stephen also reports.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
