Re: linux-next: manual merge of the davinci tree with Linus' tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the davinci tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c between commit
> 8b24599e72c9aee1ea1187e29cb9c5de9f449cce ("davinci: da850/omap-l138 evm:
> account for DEFDCDC{2,3} being tied high") from Linus' tree and commit
> ebd1e7808b2fe72d627bdab7bcf61126a831ca5a ("davinci: da850 evm: sparse
> cleanup: make file local variables static") from the davinci tree.
>
> Just context changes.  I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix
> for a while.

Thanks for catching this.

Before I submit to Linus, I'll merge this with the original tree
(Liam's voltage-2.6 tree) so Linus doesn't have to fix this up.

Kevin

> diff --cc arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c
> index b280efb,f6942dd..0000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c
> @@@ -470,12 -469,7 +470,12 @@@ static struct regulator_consumer_suppl
>        },
>  };
>
>  +/* We take advantage of the fact that both defdcdc{2,3} are tied high */
>  +static struct tps6507x_reg_platform_data tps6507x_platform_data = {
>  +      .defdcdc_default = true,
>  +};
>  +
> - struct regulator_init_data tps65070_regulator_data[] = {
> + static struct regulator_init_data tps65070_regulator_data[] = {
>        /* dcdc1 */
>        {
>                .constraints = {
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux