Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Al,

On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:25:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> After merging the vfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:498: error: unknown field 'clear_inode' specified in initializer
> 
> Caused by commit 139f224817a203ff434eda5e6d3f457bc1579f27 ("cifs: define
> inode-level cache object and register them") from the cifs tree
> interacting with commit a8036d5aec0547a2bd7e3040c69bd172e474d860
> ("convert remaining ->clear_inode() to ->evict_inode()") from the vfs
> tree.
> 
> I added the following merge fix patch (by effectively copy and paste from
> some of the other file system fixups in the vfs commit).  I have no idea
> if this is correct - someone should check.  I can carry this patch as
> necessary.

The cifs tree has been merged by Linus, so this patch can be applied to
the vfs tree, now.

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:15:47 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] cifs: fix for clear_inode -> evict_inode API change

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/cifs/cifsfs.c |    6 ++++--
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
index ba893b9..2fc5ed1 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
@@ -330,8 +330,10 @@ cifs_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode)
 }
 
 static void
-cifs_clear_inode(struct inode *inode)
+cifs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
 {
+	truncate_inode_pages(&inode->i_data, 0);
+	end_writeback(inode);
 	cifs_fscache_release_inode_cookie(inode);
 }
 
@@ -495,7 +497,7 @@ static const struct super_operations cifs_super_ops = {
 	.alloc_inode = cifs_alloc_inode,
 	.destroy_inode = cifs_destroy_inode,
 	.drop_inode	= cifs_drop_inode,
-	.clear_inode	= cifs_clear_inode,
+	.evict_inode	= cifs_evict_inode,
 /*	.delete_inode	= cifs_delete_inode,  */  /* Do not need above
 	function unless later we add lazy close of inodes or unless the
 	kernel forgets to call us with the same number of releases (closes)
-- 
1.7.1

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux