On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 09:32 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > Please, no, don't break the memblock code now. I'm not reworking the > > ARM implementation just as the merge window has opened - especially > > as the ARM implementation has now been pulled into other people's > > trees. > > > > If there's changes to memblock which haven't been in linux-next (which, > > as this is a new failure, that is most definitely the case), then they > > shouldn't be going into this merge window. > > > > Ben, what's your tack on this? I'm perfectly happy to wait for the next merge window.. or even delay it a bit til we can make sure ARM stuff is in, then memblock is updated to also update ARM. The latest failure is a bit of a concern... it shows that sh and microblaze have not tested the series when I asked them to a while back then, but then, I suppose everybody is short on time. In any case, I'll fixup those glitches in my memblock branch, and we can look at the ARM situation then and decide what to do. Cheers, Ben. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
