On Mon, 2010-08-02 at 15:59 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > >Yikes. Last minute change, eh? > > > > I do not know what you mean. The patches always had iscsi_boot_sysfs in > > the firmware dir. You mean this is a last minute change? > > Yes, this rename. > > > > > > > >>interface is generic and should be used on any arch and with anything > > >>(ibft or iscsi driver) that wants to export iscsi boot info. The > > >>attached patch moves iscsi_boot_sysfs to drivers/scsi. It was made over > > >>linux-next. I have only compile tested it. > > > > > >did you compile test it with the x86 native iBFT driver? > > > > Yes. > > Excellent. The patch does not look like it has changed at all, so: > > 1). Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> > for the removal from firmware/ibft, and > 2). Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@xxxxxxxxxx> for the > the part that puts in drivers/scsi and will make it now under James' > mainternship. > > James, > > I've asked Linus to pull my iBFT tree before yours as there was this > dependency. Are you OK putting this patch in your tree, or would you prefer > that I expunge Mike's patch from mine? I can put this patch into my post merge tree. I suspect you having a post-post-merge tree (needed for the build problems) might be a bit overkill ... James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
