On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 18:19, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in > drivers/net/e1000e/hw.h between commit > ff847ac2d3e90edd94674c28bade25ae1e6a2e49 ("") from the net-current tree > and commit d3738bb8203acf8552c3ec8b3447133fc0938ddd ("e1000e: initial > support for 82579 LOMs") from the net tree. > > Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix for > a while. > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > diff --cc drivers/net/e1000e/hw.h > index 664ed58,0cd569a..0000000 > --- a/drivers/net/e1000e/hw.h > +++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/hw.h > @@@ -308,8 -312,8 +312,8 @@@ enum e1e_registers > #define E1000_KMRNCTRLSTA_INBAND_PARAM 0x9 /* Kumeran InBand Parameters */ > #define E1000_KMRNCTRLSTA_DIAG_NELPBK 0x1000 /* Nearend Loopback mode */ > #define E1000_KMRNCTRLSTA_K1_CONFIG 0x7 > -#define E1000_KMRNCTRLSTA_K1_ENABLE 0x140E > +#define E1000_KMRNCTRLSTA_K1_ENABLE 0x0002 > - #define E1000_KMRNCTRLSTA_K1_DISABLE 0x1400 > + #define E1000_KMRNCTRLSTA_HD_CTRL 0x0002 > > #define IFE_PHY_EXTENDED_STATUS_CONTROL 0x10 > #define IFE_PHY_SPECIAL_CONTROL 0x11 /* 100BaseTx PHY Special Control */ > -- yes, that is fine and expected. When Dave sync's up is net-next-2.6 tree with net-2.6 tree, this issue will be fixed up. -- Cheers, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html