Re: linux-next: manual merge of the async_tx tree with the arm tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the async_tx tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-ux500/devices-db8500.c between commit
> 6055930cba8fdb2c8855b32bae262aaf69c1fdb4 ("ARM: 6266/1: ux500: add
> separate irq lists for DB8500 and DB5500") from the arm tree and commit
> 5aa12e8c9c57741606e52f43e62ab1b9dc8e9dcc ("DMAENGINE: ste_dma40: arch
> updates for LCLA and LCPA") from the async_tx tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> --

Thanks Stephen!

Russell, the dma40 driver updates and related arch fixups have been
sitting in next for a month, I'd prefer not to lose this baseline.
Assuming this change is brand new any chance the dma40 specific part
of this patch can be peeled off and sent through my tree, or are you
in a similar "can't/won't" rebase position?

--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux