On 07/21/2010 11:54 AM, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> Hello Russell,
>
> Your patch added a new clock to the ep93xx platform called "apb_pclk". This
> clock was already available as "pclk" on that platform.
>
> Since there are no users of "pclk" in the kernel I have no problems just
> renaming it to "apb_pclk" and removing the dummy_apb_pclk that you added.
>
> Would you like me to submit the ncessary patch or can you fix it?
The dummy_apb_pclk definition caused a merge conflict in next with the
ep93xx i2s audio clock code, which Stephen wrote a fixup patch for. Can
we sort this out all in one big go? Stephen's original message copied below.
~Ryan
---
> Hi Takashi,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the sound tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c between commit
> 5c6649e3c1511b183f12d2e884d2c172fe9001e0 ("ARM: AMBA: Add pclk definition
> for platforms using primecells") from the arm tree and commit
> ed67ea82c0d9a163458dc6a69a7a3123db1a8b3b ("EP93xx: Add i2s core support")
> from the sound tree.
>
> Just overlapping additions. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the
> fix as necessary.
---
diff --cc arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
index d40826a,8031624..0000000
--- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/clock.c
@@@ -43,9 -43,9 +43,11 @@@ static unsigned long get_uart_rate(stru
static int set_keytchclk_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate);
static int set_div_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate);
+ static int set_i2s_sclk_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate);
+ static int set_i2s_lrclk_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate);
+static struct clk dummy_apb_pclk;
+
static struct clk clk_xtali = {
.rate = EP93XX_EXT_CLK_RATE,
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
