Hi Al,
After merging the vfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
fs/nilfs2/inode.c: In function 'nilfs_clear_inode':
fs/nilfs2/inode.c:630: error: implicit declaration of function 'nilfs_btnode_cache_clear'
Caused by commit 743a0a2f1a89e53d656ec6a2f715111d92642bcb ("convert
nilfs2 to ->evict_inode()") interacting with commit
ceb4f9c819c321e7eabf53b51f956ff959561573 ("nilfs2: get rid of
nilfs_bmap_union") from the nilfs2 tree which removed the implicit
inclusion of btnode.h (via bmap_union.h via nilfs.h).
I have added the following patch for today (which should be applied to
the vfs tree or merged into the above vfs tree commit):
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 12:17:47 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] nilfs2: inode.c needs to include btnode.h directly now
Due to the new usage of nilfs_btnode_cache_clear().
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nilfs2/inode.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/inode.c b/fs/nilfs2/inode.c
index 8fea40e..eccb2f2 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/inode.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/inode.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <linux/writeback.h>
#include <linux/uio.h>
#include "nilfs.h"
+#include "btnode.h"
#include "segment.h"
#include "page.h"
#include "mdt.h"
--
1.7.1
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
