Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the xfs tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the xfs tree
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 21:48:13 -0400
Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, David Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100705100248.173ec8ee.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20100705100248.173ec8ee.sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)

Thanks Stephen,

the merge looks good to me.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the xfs tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell

References:
- linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the xfs tree
  - From: Stephen Rothwell

Prev by Date: Re: Linux 2.6.35-rc4 - CONFIG_LOCALVERSION ignored?
Next by Date: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the xfs tree
Previous by thread: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the xfs tree
Next by thread: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs tree with the xfs tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Linux USB Development] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux