Em 06-07-2010 08:10, Laurent Pinchart escreveu: > Hi Stephen, > > On Tuesday 06 July 2010 10:51:32 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 10:18:20 +0200 Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>>> diff --cc include/linux/usb/video.h >>>> index 2d5b7fc,429c91a..0000000 >>>> --- a/include/linux/usb/video.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/usb/video.h >>>> @@@ -160,12 -160,402 +160,409 @@@ >>> >>> [snip] >>> >>>> +/* 4.1.2. Control Capabilities */ >>>> +#define UVC_CONTROL_CAP_GET (1 << 0) >>>> +#define UVC_CONTROL_CAP_SET (1 << 1) >>>> +#define UVC_CONTROL_CAP_DISABLED (1 << 2) >>>> +#define UVC_CONTROL_CAP_AUTOUPDATE (1 << 3) >>>> +#define UVC_CONTROL_CAP_ASYNCHRONOUS (1 << 4) >>>> + >>> >>> Can you move those to the first part of the header file, with the other >>> constants ? >> >> Sure, I just put it there because of the section numbering in the >> comments. This, of course, will not influence how the file looks after >> Linus merges it - unless the conflict is fixed up by one of the >> maintainers before Linus gets it. > > I had the impression that the conflict resolutions in linux-next would end up > in mainline. I must have been wrong, sorry. > > Mauro, can the uvc-gadget patches go through the linux-media tree ? If Greg is ok, that's fine for me. Cheers, Mauro. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
