On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 10:04:23AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:40:33 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 10:13:00 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > I took a look, and all of the changes from "fs: remove all rcu head > > > initializations, except on_stack initializations" are reflected in -next. > > > > Thanks for checking. > > Is there some way that this commit can be merged via the block tree? Or > does later work in your tree depend on it? There is considerable and > ongoing work in the block tree on the same areas as your commit changes. > Even today, this conflict is going to be much worse. I have no problem with this patch being applied via the block tree, as long as it doesn't take too many minor releases for it to hit mainline. ;-) How would everyone like to proceed? Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
