On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 04:16:09PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> net/bridge/br_fdb.c net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_redirect.c
> net/bridge/netfilter/ebt_ulog.c net/bridge/netfilter/ebtables.c
> net/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.c between commit
> f350a0a87374418635689471606454abc7beaa3a ("bridge: use rx_handler_data
> pointer to store net_bridge_port pointer") from the net tree and commit
> 81bdf5bd7349bd4523538cbd7878f334bc2bfe14 ("net: Make accesses to
> ->br_port safe for sparse RCU") from the tip tree.
>
> The net tree commit looks like a superset of the tip tree commit, so I
> effectively reverted the tip tree commit.
I defer to Jiri on this one, and will withdraw my patch.
Thanx, Paul
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
