Re: linux-next: Tree for June 3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 05:30:09 pm Dave Young wrote:
> Seems for some module drop reference of 0 in following code of init_module:
> 
>        /* Drop initial reference. */
>         module_put(mod);

Thanks Dave, good bug report.

It was "module: refactor load_module part 4" where I initialized 
the per-cpu pointer before allocating it:

static int module_unload_init(struct module *mod)
{
...
	/* Hold reference count during initialization. */
	__this_cpu_write(mod->refptr->incs, 1);
...
	mod->refptr = alloc_percpu(struct module_ref);
...

This also explains Stephen's crash during module load (which was more
expected since refptr is NULL, though percpu ptrs don't work that way).

I've fixed it (by reversing the order of those lines) for tomorrow's
linux-next.

Thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux