HI Jens, On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 12:45:15 +0200 Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So the pipe patches were the same, the problem was that a fix for a > missing pipe_unlock() had gone into mainline and for-linus/for-next > weren't synced up to that. I'm guessing you pull drbd before for-next > and that is why it showed up there. Actually, I merge the drbd tree after the block tree and this fell to the drbd tree only because your for-next branch had not been updated (and I don't merge your for-linus branch). > BTW, I would recommend moving for-next from the block tree up before any > potential other trees being based off it if that is the case. That is already true. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpeLdNYVODkp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
