Hi Eric, On Thu, 20 May 2010 23:46:22 -0700 ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > > It looks right, except perhaps the RPS code looks like it will cause a > build failure with sysfs disabled, but that has nothing to do with your > changes. I don't see any real conflicts here, just two patches passing > very close to each other. Thanks for the confirmation. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpbbUzw596ao.pgp
Description: PGP signature
