Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung tree with the tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:04:11AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the samsung tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/gpiolib.c between commit
> ea5f50706385b61c1c0d24271bbe7c6e93129fbc ("ARM: S5PV210: Add GPIOlib
> support") from Linus' tree and commit
> 026fcae436e846b0cc1db8d4af11890dfdde3689 ("ARM: S5PV210: Add S5PV210 GPIO
> support") from the samsung tree.
> 
> Two versions of the same commit.  I used the version in Linus' tree as
> that was dated later.

sorry, the tree that went to linus had that one replaced due to a minor
bug in the GPH banks that got fixed. Decided to replace the patch than
put a patch ontop.

-- 
Ben

Q:      What's a light-year?
A:      One-third less calories than a regular year.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux