Hi Len, On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 02:52:44 +0900 Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Implicit slab.h inclusion via percpu.h is about to go away. Make sure > gfp.h or slab.h is included as necessary. Please apply this to the acpi tree (patch reposted below). From: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> To: sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [PATCH 16/17] acpi: update gfp/slab.h includes Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 02:52:44 +0900 Implicit slab.h inclusion via percpu.h is about to go away. Make sure gfp.h or slab.h is included as necessary. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c | 1 + drivers/acpi/atomicio.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c index c35fec7..2672880 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/acpi.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> #include <linux/io.h> #include <linux/kref.h> #include <linux/rculist.h> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/atomicio.c b/drivers/acpi/atomicio.c index 4ed1385..e21b1e4 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/atomicio.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/atomicio.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ #include <linux/kref.h> #include <linux/rculist.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> #include <acpi/atomicio.h> #define ACPI_PFX "ACPI: " -- 1.6.4.2 -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html