Hi Stefan, On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:00:02 +0100 Stefan Richter <stefanr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Greg tells me that the semaphore to mutex change didn't go into Linus' > > tree. However, this patch can still be applied as the device_lock/unlock > > primitives did go in. I guess that the include of mutex.h is not needed. > > An #include <linux/device.h> seems to be in order though. It is pulled > in via linux/usb.h and this is surely not bound to change anytime soon, > but still. Damn! Caught by my own "Rule #1" :-) Thanks. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpibmpCmeQkE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
