On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:44:30AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:47:47 -0800 Greg KH wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:10:37PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:04:57 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I said: > > > > > News: there will be no linux-next releases until at least Dec 24 and, > > > > > more likely, Dec 29. Have a Merry Christmas and take a break. :-) > > > > > > > > Well, I decided I had time for one more so it will be based in -rc1). > > > > > > > > This one has not had the build testing *between* merges, but has had all > > > > the normal build testing at the end. Since the latter testing showed no > > > > problems, this just means that there may be more unbisectable points in > > > > the tree (but that is unlikely). > > > > > > > > > When CONFIG_DT3155=y (i.e., not a loadable module): > > > > Ick, I'll change that to 'M' now, it shouldn't be built in just yet for > > the reasons you found. > > > > I don't think the code has ever been built as 'y' as you just found out. > > Greg, > Did you get around to making any of these changes? I have started working on them, but have not gotten to all of them yet. thanks for your patience, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
