On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 04:36:49 pm H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 02/01/2010 07:59 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > > On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:09:53 am Siarhei Liakh wrote: > >> This patch is a logical extension of the protection provided by > >> CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA to LKMs. The protection is provided by splitting > >> module_core and module_init into three logical parts each and setting > >> appropriate page access permissions for each individual section: > >> > >> 1. Code: RO+X > >> 2. RO data: RO+NX > >> 3. RW data: RW+NX > > > > Thanks, applied! > > I also applied this to the -tip tree... do you prefer to carry it or > should I leave it as is? I'm always happy for you to do my work for me! There are no other module patches likely to conflict. Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cheers, Rusty. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
