Hi Greg,
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 18:22:47 -0800 Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 06:21:15PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > > -static CLASS_ATTR(probe, S_IWUSR, NULL, cpu_probe_store);
> > > -static CLASS_ATTR(release, S_IWUSR, NULL, cpu_release_store);
> > > +static SYSDEV_ATTR(probe, S_IWUSR, NULL, cpu_probe_store);
> >
> > This defines attr_probe as a "struct sysdev_attribute" whose attr element
> > is a "struct attribute".
> >
> > > +static SYSDEV_ATTR(release, S_IWUSR, NULL, cpu_release_store);
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE */
> > >
> > > #else /* ... !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
> > > @@ -261,8 +261,8 @@ int __init cpu_dev_init(void)
> > >
> > > static struct sysdev_class_attribute *cpu_sysdev_class_attrs[] = {
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_CPU_PROBE_RELEASE
> > > - &class_attr_probe.attr,
> > > - &class_attr_release.attr,
> > > + &attr_probe.attr,
> >
> > so here we are initialising a "struct sysdev_class_attribute *" with a
> > "struct attribute *". Thus the warning.
>
> Doh, sorry about that. I've fixed it up now and pushed it out.
Still not right :-( &attr_probe and &attr_release are "struct
sysdev_attribute *" after this patch, but are being assigned to "struct
sysdev_class_attribute *" ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpke52i0jPCq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
