Hello,
On 02/03/2010 02:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
> net/ipv6/proc.c between commit 5833929cc2ad2b3064b4fac8c44e293972d240d8
> ("net: constify MIB name tables") from the net tree and commit
> d3f5fa4075414c7754126fbdc7c8fbd3906db7c8 ("percpu: add __percpu sparse
> annotations to net") from the percpu tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
>
> Maybe you guys could send Linus a simple one line patch for v2.6.33 that
> adds
>
> #define __percpu
>
> to include/linux/compiler.h (unconditionally) and then farm out the
> patches that add the __percpu annotations to other maintainers.
How about just adding dummy #define __percpu in each tree? I don't
think git will have much problem merging them.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
