Hi Mark, On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:34:24 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The way I've always read that was that you'd found a build failure in > a given bit of the tree while testing -next - you're clearly doing some > work to identify and understand where the failure came from (and simply > looking at the source file leads to the same result normally anyway) so > the fact that you've identified the subsystem doesn't automatically say > that this happened with a partially merged -next. If you looked less > like a human the subject by itself would be clearer :) How about "linux-next: build failure after merging xxx tree"? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgps27gRAncSP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
