Hi - On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 05:59:59PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > [...] > > Including experimental code that is RFC and which is not certain to go > > upstream is certainly not the purpose of linux-next though. > > Ingo is correct in what he says here. See the boilerplate: > [...] > Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him > to fetch)." > I will remove this tree from linux-next tomorrow and wait until it is > more ready for mainline inclusion. Please reconsider. Ingo mistook what was being proposed. We request merge/integration testing for just the set of patches posted <http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/17/466>, which was in response to peterz's earlier review comments, and none of which is labeled or considered RFC or experimental. Ananth was right that the utrace-ptrace git branch represents this rather than master. - FChE
Attachment:
pgpErzgfy119v.pgp
Description: PGP signature
