On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:12:26AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Fengguang,
>
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:40:39 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:29:52 +0800 "Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:05:01 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > It actually looks like commit c29af9636 ("sysdev: Pass attribute in
> > > > > sysdev_class attributes show/store") referred to in the changelog for the
> > > > > above commit has not yet been applied to Linus' tree?
> > > >
> > > > Commit c29af9636 ("sysdev: Pass attribute in sysdev_class attributes
> > > > show/store") does appear in linux-next since next-20100111 (in the
> > > > driver-core quilt series - therefore intended for 2.6.34) (it will have a
> > > > different SHA1 today)
> > >
> > > So let's queue 8ff410daa009c (sysdev: fix prototype for memory_sysdev_class show/store functions)
> > > in driver-core and delay it to 2.6.34?
> >
> > Then it would need to be reverted from Linus' tree.
>
> I have reverted commit 8ff410daa009c for today. It looks like Greg
> already has the alternate patches queued in the driver-core tree to take
> care of this problem when it arises.
>
> So, Greg, can you ask Linus to revert 8ff410daa009c (sysdev: fix
> prototype for memory_sysdev_class show/store functions), please? Or
> should I? Or should we hope he notices these emails? :-)
No, I think the patch in Linus's tree is correct, so I have fixed up my
tree now.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
