On 12/16/2009 09:24 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:32:12 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> My usual call for calm: please do not put stuff destined for 2.6.34 into >> linux-next trees until after 2.6.33-rc1. >> >> Changes since 20091215: > > > When CONFIG_SMP=n, CONFIG_X86_MSR=m: > > ERROR: "msrs_free" [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.ko] undefined! > ERROR: "msrs_alloc" [drivers/edac/amd64_edac_mod.ko] undefined! > > > Should EDAC_AMD64 also depend on SMP? > That seems absurd... more likely msrs_free/msrs_alloc should not be SMP-specific, or stubs need to be provided. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
