Hi Stephen,
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 13:38 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Liam,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the voltage tree got a conflict in
> drivers/regulator/twl-regulator.c between commit
> 441a450554dada1c59fc06fdf068cb0eeba53c6d ("regulator: Add support for
> twl6030 regulators") from Linus' tree and commits
> 6360cf42ae51be5f6e6e72d6e81f202d9db0f7e9 ("twl4030-regulator: Remove
> regulator from all groups when disabling") and
> 3277b9fce0fcaa68d5947429e062163852ebc6fb ("twl4030-regulator: Add all TWL
> regulators to twreg_info") from the voltage tree.
>
> I cannot begin to fix this mess up. I do wonder why the regulator patch
> above was never in linux-next before being sent upstream yesterday
> (Samuel?). All I can do is use the version of the voltage tree from
> next-20091120 (commit id b0a7a2ad0aebb35934de6d2509c73fe93a362c0e) for
> today and hope that Liam can do the merge with Linus' tree.
>
Sorry about this. There were some large patch sets that did span both
mfd and regulator recently.
I'll fix and do my pull request today.
Liam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
