Hi Mauro, On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:30:02 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:54:35 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Yeah, the i7core_edac fix needs to stay in my tree as it is an > > interaction between two trees in linux-next. The others should be > > applied to the powerpc and sparc trees, as you say, since they fix the > > current code in those trees. > > Actually, Mauro, this patch should be applied to the i7core_edac as that > symbol never needed to be exported and the patch to export it is in that > tree. Is there any reason that this patch (copied below) cannot be applied to the i7core_edac tree? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:55:38 +1100 Subject: [PATCH] i7core_edac: do not export static functions Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/x86/pci/legacy.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/legacy.c b/arch/x86/pci/legacy.c index 5e22d83..a8194c8 100644 --- a/arch/x86/pci/legacy.c +++ b/arch/x86/pci/legacy.c @@ -38,7 +38,6 @@ static int __init pci_legacy_init(void) return 0; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_legacy_init); void pcibios_scan_specific_bus(int busn) { -- 1.6.5.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
